Creating Impact

How do our partners create impact?

Read about our theory of change in detail in our White Paper.

Our partners’ models share two foundational characteristics…

Small-scale: Each student matters to the baseline functions of the community; small enough that they can easily see their actions, and inactions make a difference. In intimate settings, it’s intuitive to feel belonging to something larger than yourself.  

Communal Living:An environment where students are given ownership over choices of consequence to the community, so that the quality and outcome of their engagement matters.

…which help students see themselves as capable changemakers.

Said best in the words of novelist Haruki Murakami, these models are an education based in “a steady accumulation of small realities” rather than just “words and promises.” Students build repositories of times that they exercised agency, rose to the occasion, and made material differences in people’s lives. These programs “serve as incubators where the promise of how we can live, learn, recognize, and care for each other [becomes] a reality on a small scale ... [and they] inspire learners to understand themselves as capable changemakers”.

This is our Theory of Change for how this approach to education works.

… and use unique tools that make an outsized impact.

Place-Specific Academics

The Arts

Embodied Labor

Self-Governance

The result is transformative educational conditions…

Through participation in communal, democratic living of this kind, students experience

  • interdependence,

  • work with real stakes, and

  • placefulness. 

What does this look like? Students see their success as individuals tied to the success of the group. Communal living and self-governance train students’ instincts to consider each other’s needs in a profound way, and put a premium on their attention to their relationships. Students add value for others, and feel valued by others, interdependent at the intersection of power, responsibility, and community. Students engage with work that has real consequence; either through hands-on, tangible projects, or through important community decision-making.

The distillation of micro-college principles is enormously helpful to map our own communal practices and collective processes onto a clear, shared vocabulary. We were deeply moved and felt a renewed sense of hope and purpose reading Springboard’s report. I can’t say enough about how motivating it feels to be part of a growing movement, not just an isolated “alternative education” program.

- Dr. Isabela Granic (Executive Director of Liminal Learning)